avatar: Newbud
0
4

This may bore most folks but I have been playing something I devised and would like some input.
I'm lost and do not have the tech down pat. I've been playing this for some time both at Casino and home.
Let me know what you think about this.
Record each spin and when any final has not appeared for say 25 turns bet it.
For a 7, 8, 9. 0 I have 65 profitable bets I can make.
For a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 I Have 46 profitable bets I can make.
I ignore green 0 and 00. For 1000 spins I average at least $3 per spin.
Wins are larger and I count every spin to get my average.
I have thousands of spins recorded and haven't lost yet. I do know that losing is an eventual certainty.
But if I win even at my minimum after a thousand wins i can take the loss. There are some variations I use from time to time.
I won't get in to them but they work as well but haven't been tested like the one I just explained.
I have successful strategies for most bets, I don't like corner bets. I play american roulette.
At the Casino we just try to win enough not to draw attention to ourselves.

Report Post
Playing a final strategy
avatar: trizero
youroul.com

80
669

Hello Newbud, welcome to youroul.com!
Here you can find certainty without any doubt.
If you configure your roulette strategies for the simulator,
then you will see strategy tests without manual faults or wrong calculations.

Newbud:

I have successful strategies for most bets.

There are not many alternatives for this statement. Let me see...
[1] You have successful strategies in theoretical terms like a Martingale without table limit.
[2] You have a truly mysterious roulette strategy which never loses.
[3] You did a calculation fault.
[4] You are a very lucky guy.
What do you say?


Report Post
Playing a final strategy
avatar: Newbud
0
4

First I've said I've never lost. I didn't say I can't lose.
I have a strategy for Double street with one, two or three double streets.
I play a follow strategy. I also wait x number of spins before I make a bet.
For a one way double street I wait 9 spins before I bet. Each type of bet requires patience, bank and bet sequence.
I like to have a partner but that is unnecessary. I do use a betting progression designed with each bet type in mind.
For instance my double street system has 3 different betting streams.
We watch people lose at the casino even in a streak but we don't.
We play with discipline and stick to the rules of each system.
There are triggers we look for. For instance no repeats for a certain number of spins.
I have 4 different betting procedures for corner bets, I have 5 methods for street bets.
Five for split bets. Ten for straight bets. I have looked at countless numbers and tested each method against those numbers.
I had a doctor friend who told me I had magical thinking until we took him to the casino.
I don't mind doubters but its not necessary to imply ridicule.
I would like a bigger test that takes into account my parameters of wait and triggers.
I can't design a program to do so and I have no problem sharing. Once again I am looking for help.
Keep in mind that just because you don't understand doesn't mean my system don't work. Thank you!

Report Post
Playing a final strategy
avatar: Newbud
0
4

One last thing is that I have strategies that don't require a bet with every spin in the system.
I believe it may be impossible to test with your parameters. I am not greedy or lucky or magical.
I just have a different way of looking at a problem.
The problem is being able to choose what is the best way to proceed and make a winning bet.
The choice is not believing all the negative ideas that somehow the casino or math theory is absolute.
I'm positive I can't predict the next number or group of numbers but I am positive that whatever number singly or in a group you can imagine will eventually come.
All I'm saying is that I want to be there when that happens.
I tested many systems that did not work and scrapped them. Some lasted a while.
The systems I use now have not failed. I am not at all a naive individual who is so full of himself he can't be wrong.
I'm just the guy who wants to be proved wrong. Amen brother!

Report Post
Playing a final strategy
avatar: trizero
youroul.com

80
669

Newbud:

I'm just the guy who wants to be proved wrong. Amen brother!

I am just the guy who developed the tool.
You can get your proof if you learn to work with the strategy editor to build your own systems.

I am very sorry that the help pages and descriptions are not perfect, but they should be complete at least.
Use the mouse over functionality it can help sometimes!
When there are specific questions, then try to shape them precisely please. I'll try to explain how things are done.
I wish a lot of fun with the only truly existing roulette strategy simulation!

Newbud:

Record each spin and when any final has not appeared for say 25 turns bet it.
For a 7, 8, 9. 0 I have 65 profitable bets I can make.

You wait for some finals not to come and then you bet?
What differentiates finals from e.g. streets or corners?
The roulette simulator knows the concept of run time chances where you can set the numbers of spins to "wait".
Then you configure your chance as Laggard.
The published roulette strategy the Restant + does this for example.

Report Post
Playing a final strategy
avatar: banksy
12
39

Newbud:

I don't like corner bets.

I also!

Newbud:

I have 4 different betting procedures for corner bets

Then why are you playing it?
In addition, in four variants, where one would be more than enough?!

And that's just one obvious contradiction!
The lesson from this post should be: spearfishing

Newbud:

I like to have a partner but that is unnecessary.

Please please let me be your partner, please!
Report Post
Playing a final strategy