Finals Strategy: Waiting for Overdue Finals

This may bore most folks but I have been playing something I devised and would like some input.
I'm lost and do not have the tech down pat. I've been playing this for some time both at Casino and home.
Let me know what you think about this.
Record each spin and when any final has not appeared for say 25 turns bet it.
For a 7, 8, 9, 0 I have 65 profitable bets I can make.
For a 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 I have 46 profitable bets I can make.
I ignore green 0 and 00. For 1,000 spins I average at least $3 per spin.
Wins are larger and I count every spin to get my average.
I have thousands of spins recorded and haven't lost yet. I do know that losing is an eventual certainty.
But if I win even at my minimum after a thousand wins I can take the loss. There are some variations I use from time to time.
I won't get in to them but they work as well but haven't been tested like the one I just explained.
I have successful strategies for most bets, I don't like corner bets. I play American roulette.
At the Casino we just try to win enough not to draw attention to ourselves.

Hello Newbud, welcome to youroul.com!
Here you can find certainty without any doubt.
If you configure your roulette strategies for the simulator,
strategy tests without manual faults or wrong calculations are possible.

successful strategies for most bets

Newbud:

I have successful strategies for most bets.

There are not many alternatives for this statement. Let me see...
[1] Successful strategies exist in theoretical terms like a Martingale without table limit.
[2] There is a truly mysterious roulette strategy which never loses.
[3] There was a calculation fault.
[4] It was just a very lucky run.
What is the answer?

First, I've said I've never lost. I didn't say I can't lose.
I have a strategy for Double Street with one, two or three double streets.
I play a follow strategy. I also wait x number of spins before I make a bet.
For a one way double street I wait 9 spins before I bet. Each type of bet requires patience, bank and bet sequence.
I like to have a partner but that is unnecessary. I do use a betting progression designed with each bet type in mind.
For instance my double street system has 3 different betting streams.
We watch people lose at the casino even in a streak but we don't.
We play with discipline and stick to the rules of each system.
There are triggers we look for. For instance no repeats for a certain number of spins.
I have 4 different betting procedures for corner bets, I have 5 methods for street bets.
Five for split bets. Ten for straight bets. I have looked at countless numbers and tested each method against those numbers.
I had a doctor friend who told me I had magical thinking until we took him to the casino.
I don't mind doubters but it's not necessary to imply ridicule.
I would like a bigger test that takes into account my parameters of wait and triggers.
I can't design a program to do so and I have no problem sharing. Once again I am looking for help.
Keep in mind that just because you don't understand doesn't mean my system doesn't work. Thank you!

One last thing is that I have strategies that don't require a bet with every spin in the system.
I believe it may be impossible to test with your parameters. I am not greedy or lucky or magical.
I just have a different way of looking at a problem.
The problem is being able to choose what is the best way to proceed and make a winning bet.
The choice is not believing all the negative ideas that somehow the casino or math theory is absolute.
I'm positive I can't predict the next number or group of numbers but I am positive that whatever number singly or in a group you can imagine will eventually come.
All I'm saying is that I want to be there when that happens.
I tested many systems that did not work and scrapped them. Some lasted a while.
The systems I use now have not failed. I am not at all a naive individual who is so full of himself he can't be wrong.
I'm just the guy who wants to be proved wrong. Amen brother!

Newbud:

I'm just the guy who wants to be proved wrong. Amen brother!

The tool was developed - that's all.
Proof can be obtained by learning to work with the strategy editor to build your own systems.

It is regrettable that the help pages and descriptions are not perfect, but they should be complete at least.
The mouse over functionality can help sometimes!
When there are specific questions, try to shape them precisely. An explanation of how things are done will follow.
Wishing lots of fun with the only truly existing roulette strategy simulation!

Newbud:

Record each spin and when any final has not appeared for say 25 turns bet it.
For a 7, 8, 9, 0 there are 65 profitable bets available.

Waiting for some finals not to come and then betting?
What differentiates finals from e.g. streets or corners?
The roulette simulator knows the concept of run time chances where the numbers of spins to "wait" can be configured.
Then the chance is configured as Laggard.
The published roulette strategy the Restant + does this for example.

Newbud:

I don't like corner bets.

Same here!

Newbud:

I have 4 different betting procedures for corner bets.

Then why play it?
In addition, in four variants, where one would be more than enough?!

And that's just one obvious contradiction!
The lesson from this post should be: spearfishing

Newbud:

I like to have a partner but that is unnecessary.

Please, please - being your partner would be a pleasure!

Wow, this is exactly what I have been looking for!

A system that actually works - and with so many variations for every bet type.
I have been losing at the casino for months and nothing I tried has worked.
Could you please share your double street system with me?
I am willing to try anything at this point.

I don't have a lot of experience with betting progressions but I learn fast.
And I would love to be your partner - I am at the casino almost every weekend!
Please let me know how I can help and what I need to do.
I have some savings set aside and I am ready to get started.