avatar: trizero
youroul.com

79
708

There is a very similar strategy to this one: Loss Raise - just a little


The strategies differ in the first bet amount and the raise factor on loss.


Here are the results and histories of both, for comparison:

Report Post
avatar: trizero
youroul.com

79
708

first bet 20, loss factor 1.05
Small But Nice
user image
user image


first bet 11, loss factor 1.1
Loss Raise - just a little
user image
user image

Report Post
avatar: timy
12
38

The Histories of loss raise look much better than the one of small but nice,
is this a proof of concept, or just coincidence of the samples?

Report Post
avatar: trizero
youroul.com

79
708

timy:

The Histories of loss raise look much better than the one of small but nice,
is this a proof of concept, or just coincidence of the samples?

I just don't know!


Nicole who created these strategies, tries to succeed with very flat loss progressions.
The strategies are very similar in the construction.


The results speak for themselves.

Report Post
avatar: timy
12
38

trizero:

I just don't know!

You should!

Report Post
avatar: trizero
youroul.com

79
708

timy:

trizero:

I just don't know!

You should!

I made the tool but not the artwork!


Have fun with your roulette strategies, trizero

Report Post
Log In
Help Report Problem Contact
About us