As interesting as it is to use this site to test strategies of roulette, the truth is,

that the only thing that is really important is the PROBABILITY that you will win in any one session.

timy

that the only thing that is really important is the PROBABILITY that you will win in any one session.

timy

timy:

As interesting as it is to use this site to test strategies of roulette, the truth is,

that the only thing that is really important is the PROBABILITY that you will win in any one session.

You are right, the probability is important.

Look at the result overview charts of the strategies, there you can see everything you want.

(not just a single value)

Its a bit more complex than "in 99 % your average win is 3 pieces".... :-)

Have fun with strategy,

trizero

trizero:

You are right, the probability is important.

Look at the result overview charts of the strategies, there you can see everything you want.

(not just a single value)

Its a bit more complex than "in 99 % your average win is 3 pieces".... :-)

So why is *this simple thing* not shown somewhere?!

timy:

So why is *this simple thing* not shown somewhere?!

Hello timy,

it is only a

**simple**thing if you have

__flat__and straight progressions and strategies,

like the Martingale.

But if the strategy has forks, or uses tricks like on balance,

you would get a "probability tree" that would look similar to step trees.

Depending on the length of the simulation it would be thousands of values......

thats why those probabilty values are missing.

I think the results are much better representated by the result overview charts, for example:

strategy

**my bank job**

Have fun with strategy,

trizero

trizero:

Depending on the length of the simulation it would be thousands of values......

thats why those probabilty values are missing.

Thanks trizero,

thats a very feasible reason!

By now i understand the intent of the graphs, so my question was answered two times.

Best regards and thank you,

timy